Avtor/Urednik		Zupančič, Karel
Naslov		Spočetje z biomedicinsko pomočjo - problemi pri uveljavljanju nove pravne ureditve
Tip		članek
Vir		In: Flis V, Reberšek-Gorišek J, Rijavec V, et al, editors. Medicina in pravo: izbrana poglavja: 2001, 2002, 2003. Maribor: Splošna bolnišnica Maribor,
Leto izdaje		2004
Obseg		str. 97-103
Jezik		slo
Abstrakt		The Changes and Completion Novel Act on Infertility Treatment on Biomedically Assisted Procreation (in continuation: Law 1000)- which was rejected on referendum, disputed the referendum body regarding only one novelty: regarding the right of a woman without partner to biomedically assisted procreatian. The disputable provision is contrary to the basic concept of Law 1000 that- biomedically assisted procreation should help only people, who can not have children because of infecundity. ln the case of a woman without a permanent relationship with a man, we can not know, if she is infecundent. A woman without a partner is by, Law 1000, not allowed to heal her infecundity- assuming of course, that her infecundity is established. The disputable provision is also not acceptable from the point of view of protecting the child's interests, who was conceived with the biomedically assisted procreation. lt is not in child's best interests (which is reguested by the UN CRC, 1989), if the child is born to single woman and there is little possibility that child would ever have a lather. This principle is also confirmed in European legislation; that for the best interest of child is served when the child is born to both a mother and a father (and that the child grows up in such an environment).
Deskriptorji		CHILD ADVOCACY FERTILIZATION IN VITRO WOMEN'S RIGHTS