Author/Editor		Flis, Vojko
Title		Privolitev v zdravnikovo ukrepanje
Type		članek
Source		In: Hojs R, Krajnc I, Pahor A, et al, editors. Zbornik predavanj in praktikum 19. srečanje internistov in zdravnikov splošne medicine "Iz prakse za prakso"; 2008 maj 30-31; Maribor. Maribor: Univerzitetni klinični center,
Publication year		2008
Volume		str. 51-68
Language		slo
Abstract		Although most jurisdictions have sorted out their positions on the major issues arising under the informed consent doctrine, some significant questions still remain. One of them is a very different explanation and interpretation of medical and legal model of informed consent doctrine. Many physicians and lawyers areuncertain as to the applicable requirements of informed consent doctrine and how to satisfy them in daily practice routine. To all this informed consent claims in malpractice litigation rarely stand alone. They are generally appended to an underlying count of negligent care. They can be most troublesome if the informed consent process has not been adequately documented. The claim that the patient was not adequately informed prior to treatment can be difficult to address as the information about the process of explanation is not kept in an uniform way. In usual team work questions can arise as to whose responsibility it is to inform the patient, when to inform, obtain his or her consent to treatment, document the consent, etc. In the paper presented the author discusses some opened legal and medical issues of informed consent doctrine.
Summary		Četudi večina pravnih redov tako ali drugače ureja temeljna vprašanja doktrine o zavestni privolitvi, ostajajo številna vprašanja odprta. Eno izmed njih je različen pogled pravnikov in zdravnikov na model zavestne privolitve. Številni zdravniki in pravniki so negotovi, ko je potrebno načela doktrine o zavestni privolitvi uporabiti v praksi. Ob tem se tožbe v zvezi z zavestno privolitvijo redko pojavljajo samostojno. Zapletene so v primerih, ko pogovor med zdravnikom in bolnikom ni bil zadostno zabeležen, še posebej zategadelj, ker ni enotnih načel o tem, kako sam postopek dokumentirati. Kontinentalni pravni redi v teoriji ne zahtevajo obličnosti, vendar jo je izoblikovala pravna praksa, ki v nemškem govornem področju, ki je po pravni ureditvi sorodno Sloveniji, natančno določajo obliko in vsebino zavestne privolitve. V Sloveniji obličnost po novem ureja Zakon o bolnikovih pravicah. Seveda pa v podrobnostih številna vprašanja zavestne privolitve v praksi ostajajo neodgovorjena. Avtor predstavlja koncept pojasnilne dolžnosti v praksi in razpravlja o nekaterih odprtih vprašanjih.
Descriptors		INFORMED CONSENT PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE