Avtor/Urednik		Flis, Vojko; Reberšek Gorišek, Jelka
Naslov		Privolitev v zdravnikovo ukrepanje
Tip		članek
Vir		In: Medicina in pravo: sodobne dileme Maribor : Pravna fakulteta
Leto izdaje		2006
Obseg		str. 85-99
Jezik		slv
Abstrakt		Zahteva po pridobitvi privolitve pred zdravljenjem (kasneje tudi ugotavljanjem) bolezni je bila do osemnajstega stoletja del anglosaškega pravnega reda. Vendar je stališče, da šele bolnikova privolitev v procese ugotavljanja in zdravljenja bolezni daje temu pravno veljavnost, v anglosaški pravni praksi mlajše od petdeset let, v kontinentalni pa je v rabi še krajši čas. Četudi večina pravnih redov tako ali drugače ureja temeljna vprašanja doktrine o zavestni privolitvi, ostajajo številna vprašanja odprta. Eno izmed njih je različen pogled pravnikov in zdravnikov na model zavestne privolitve. Številni zdravniki in pravniki so negotovi, ko je potrebno načela doktrine o zavestni privolitvi uporabiti v praksi. Ob tem se tožbe v zvezi z zavestno privolitvijo redko pojavljajo samostojno. Običajno so povezane s trditvami o malomarnem ali nevestnem ravnanju. Zapletene so v primerih, ko pogovor med zdravnikom in bolnikom ni bil zadostno zabeležen, še posebej zategadelj, ker ni enotnih načel o tem, kako sam postopek dokumentirati. Obravnava bolnika je v sodobni medicini običajno skupinsko delo. Zastavljajo se vprašanja o tem, kdo, kdaj in na kakšen način naj pridobi bolnikovo privolitev. V pregledu avtorja razpravljata o nekaterih odprtih medicinskih in pravnih vprašanjih doktrine o zavestni privolitvi.The requirement that physicians must obtain consent from their patients before proceeding with diagnostic procedures and treatment has been a part of Anglo-American jurisprudence since eighteenth century in England. However, the notion that the patient's consent must be informed in order to be legally effective dates back less than 50 years in Anglo-American jurisprudence and in continental jurisprudence it is even younger. Although most jurisdictions have sorted out their positions on the major issues arising under the informed consent doctrine, some significant questions still remain. One of them is very different explanation and interpretation of medical and legal model of informed consent doctrine. Many physicians and lawyers are uncertain as to the applicable requirements of informed consent doctrine and how to satify them in daily practice routine. To all this informed consent claims in malpractice litigation rarely stand alone. They are generally appended to an underlying count of negligent care. They can be most troublesome if the informed consent process has not been adequately documented. The claim that the patient was not adequately informed prior to treatment can be difficult to address as the information about the process of explanation is not kept in an inform, obtain his or her consent to treatment, document to the consent, etc. In presented paper author discusses some opened legal and medical issues of informed consent doctrine.
Deskriptorji		Informed Consent Pojasnilna dolžnost Physician-Patient Relations Zdravnik-bolnik, odnosi Patient Acceptance of Health Care Bolnik, sprejetje zdravstvene oskrbe