Avtor/Urednik		Dolenc, Anton
Naslov		Izvedenstvo iz teorije in prakse ISM
Prevedeni naslov		Expertise from theory and practice of the Institute of forensic medicine
Tip		članek
Vir		In: Balažic J, Štefanič B, editors. Ocenjevanje telesnih poškodb. Medicinsko izvedenstvo 96. 2. memorialni sestanek akademika Janeza Milčinskega; 1996 dec 3-4; Ljubljana. Ljubljana: Medicinska fakulteta, Inštitut za sodno medicino,
Leto izdaje		1996
Obseg		str. 21-4
Jezik		slo
Abstrakt		There are no special internal rules at the institute as to how expert work should be carried out, however, a 6 point form for expert opinions has been adopted throughout recent decades. Although the Law on Criminal procedure does not foresee different levels of expert opinions, such tendencies are present in Slovene practice, where the appropriate faculty opinion is regarded as the highest opinion. We believe that expert opinions should be handled in levels, just as in judicial practice, which we especially emphasise. We believe that in the future the number of expert opinions will rise significantly due to changes in the insurance system and under the influence of western legislation. The Institute of Forensic Medicine has no special internal rules on expert work, since every single case can be directly discussed at an expert collegium where the most appropriate content and form of work (individual expert work, several experts, opinion of all experts of the institute) can be decided upon. The content of an expert opinion is dictated by the established formal outline of drawing up an expert opinion (J. Milčinski), which is in the following order:
Deskriptorji		EXPERT TESTIMONY FORENSIC MEDICINE