Avtor/Urednik | Zakotnik, B; Pokorn, M; Čižman, M | |
Naslov | Mnenje staršev o cepljenju v Sloveniji | |
Prevedeni naslov | Perception of immunization among parents in Slovenia | |
Tip | članek | |
Vir | Slov Pediatr | |
Vol. in št. | Letnik 9, št. 2-3 | |
Leto izdaje | 2002 | |
Obseg | str. 164-7 | |
Jezik | slo | |
Abstrakt | Background: Immunization in children is mandatory in Slovenia. In recent years doubts about the safety of vaccines have been raised and an appeal was made by a group of parents to change the legislation requiring mandatory immunization. Aim: To determine parental attitudes towards immunization and to see if immunization rates would have dropped after the change of legislation. Methods: A questionnaire was given to 1400 parents who brought their children to a well or sick child clinic in paediatric practices all around the country at the end of April 2001. Opinions regarding immunization and demographic data were sought. Results: 1341 (95.8 %) responses were received. 70.8 % of respondents believe that immunization should be mandatory and 26.3 % believe that this decision should be made by doctors. If immunization were only recommended, 57.6 % of parents would still immunize their children, a further 40.6 % would do so on the advice of their paediatrician, while 1.8 % would not immunize their children. When the parents were asked against which disease they would definitely vaccinate their children, the highest response rate was 85.2 % for poliomyelitis and only 53.4 % for rubella. Only 10.6 % of parents believe that unimmunized children should be admitted to kindergarten, 35.4 % oppose this, while the remainder would leave the decision to doctors and the kindergarten. 77.5 % of parents were adequately informed prior to immunization. The child's paediatrician was the most reliable source of information regarding immunization in 85 % of respondents. Conclusion: There is considerable confidence in immunization among parents in Slovenia. If immunization were recommended instead of being mandatory, immunization rates would not drop, provided that paediatricians keep parents informed. | |
Izvleček | Izhodišča: Cepljenja otrok so v Sloveniji obvezna. V zadnjih letih so se med starši pojavili dvomi v varnost cepiv, skupina staršev pa je tudi sprožila postopek za spremembo veljavne zakonodaje. Namen: Izvedeti smo želeli, kakšno je mnenje staršev glede cepljenja, in ugotoviti, ali bi se ob spremembi zakonodaje precepljenost zmanjšala. Preiskovanci in metode: 1400 staršev, ki so pripeljali svoje otroke na pregled k pediatrom v različnih krajih države konec aprila 2001, je prejelo vprašalnike, s katerimi smo želeli izvedeti njihovo mnenje o cepljenju in demografske podatke. Rezultati: Prejeli smo 1341 (95,8 %) izpolnjenih vprašalnikov. 70,8 % vprašanih meni, da je prav, da so cepljenja obvezna, 26,3 % pa prepušča to odločitev zdravnikom. Če bi bila cepljenja le priporočena, bi otroka zanesljivo cepilo 57,6 % staršev, 40,6 % bi se odločilo glede na nasvet svojega pediatra, 1,8 % pa svojih otrok zanesljivo ne bi cepilo. Če bi odločali sami, bi največ (85,2 %) staršev otroka cepilo proti otroški paralizi, najmanj pa proti rdečkam (53,4 %). 35,4 % staršev meni, da mora biti otrok pred vstopom v vrtec cepljen, 10,6 % meni, da to ni potrebno, ostali prepuščajo odločitev zdravnikom in vrtcem. 77,5 % staršev je zadovoljnih s količino informacij, ki jih dobijo pred cepljenjem. Vir informacij, ki mu najbolj zaupajo, je za 86 % vprašanih otrokov pediater. Zaključek: Starši v Sloveniji so cepljenju dokaj naklonjeni. Če bi bilo cepljenje zgolj priporočeno in ne obvezno, pa bi morali pediatri z dobrim informiranjem staršev poskrbeti, da precepljenost ne bi upadla. | |
Deskriptorji | PARENTS VACCINATION ATTITUDE HEALTH EDUCATION ADULT QUESTIONNAIRES |