Avtor/Urednik     Klemenčič, Maja; Klešnik, Alja
Naslov     Pristranost v poročanju o bolnikovih težavah
Tip     monografija
Kraj izdaje     Ljubljana
Založnik     Medicinska fakulteta
Leto izdaje     2002
Obseg     str. 39
Jezik     slo
Abstrakt     BACKGROUND. The abbility of reporting accuratelly what a patient has told is of vital importance in medicine. Doctor's interpretation reflects not only what was actually said, but also doctor's view of the problem, which is also influenced by certain aspects of the circumstances he is in at the moment or his personal characteristics. In the research we tried to asses the differences that exist between what the patient really said and the interpretation of his problem. We also wanted to know, if the information becomes omitted or added. HYPOTHESIS. l. there are important differences between what the patient says and what is actually communicated. 2. part of information is omitted and new information appear from the side of the mediator. 3. additional information increases understanding of the patient. METHODS. A semi - structured questionaire has been used. The questionaires have been transcribed and coded ( by two independent researchers and the help of a computer programme ATLAS ). Afterwards the following question has been posed to the medical students, who have been involved as the interviewers: »What do you remember from the interviews with the patients?« These interviews were also transcribed and coded. The transcripts and the codes of the interviewers were compared with the transcripts of the patients. RESULTS. After the comparison of the patient's transcripts with the transcripts of the interviewers, we could divide the data in the following three cathegories of information: omitted - the ones that appear in the transcripts of the patients, but never in the transcripts of the interviewers, added - the ones that appear only in the transcripts of the interviewers and agreed - they appear in the transcripts of the patients and interviewers. We have produced a model, that is trying to explain what is happening to the information in the process of communication. (Abstract truncated at 2000 characters).
Deskriptorji     MEDICAL HISTORY TAKING
PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS
AGED
QUESTIONNAIRES