Author/Editor		Meden, Edita; Kvas, Andreja; Hoyer, Silvestra
Title		Opisna raziskava mnenj in stališč študentov zdravstvene nege ter kliničnih mentorjev glede ocenjevanja kliničnega usposabljanja
Translated title		A descriptive research on opinions and views of nursing students and clinical mentors on assessment of clinical practice
Type		članek
Vol. and No.		Letnik 51, št. 4
Publication year		2017
Volume		str. 320-327
ISSN		1318-2951 - Obzornik Zdravstvene Nege
Language		slv
Abstract		Uvod: Z nenačrtovanim ocenjevanjem na podlagi pomanjkljivo opredeljenih kriterijev lahko spregledamo neuspešnega študenta in tako prispevamo k njegovemu nevarnemu delovanju v kliničnem okolju. Namen raziskave je bil ugotoviti, kakšna so stališča in mnenja kliničnih mentorjev ter študentov zdravstvene nege glede ocenjevanja kliničnega usposabljanja. Metode: Uporabljena je bila kvantitativna deskriptivna metoda dela. Spletno anketo je izpolnilo 84 dodiplomskih študentov zdravstvene nege, njeno tiskano različico pa 37 kliničnih mentorjev. Zbiranje podatkov je potekalo od oktobra do novembra 2015. V analizi je bila uporabljena osnovna opisna statistika, hi-kvadrat test, Mann-Whitneyev U-test in Pearsonov koeficient korelacije. Rezultati: Klinični mentorji so v večji meri kot študenti mnenja, da bi se morali na klinično usposabljanje načrtno pripraviti (U = 790, p < 0,001). S Pearsonovim koeficientom korelacije (r = %0,215, p = 0,024) smo ugotovili, da je zadovoljstvo z ocenjevanjem vseh anketiranih večje, če je ocenjevanje sprotno in ne le končno. Hi-kvadrat test je pokazal, da anketiranci ocenjevalni list ocenjujejo kot samo zadovoljiv (n = 47, 43,5 %; x2 = 4,3, p = 0,229). Diskusija in zaključek: Večina anketirancev ni zadovoljnih z načinom ocenjevanja kliničnega usposabljanja. Zavedajo se pomanjkljivosti ocenjevalnega lista, opozarjajo tudi na pomanjkanje časa pri mentoriranju študentov. Raziskava prispeva k boljšemu razumevanju razmer v procesu ocenjevanja kliničnega usposabljanja.Introduction: Unplanned assessment based on criteria that have not been precisely defined may result in overlooking an unsuccessful student, thus contributing to hazardous work in a clinical setting. The purpose of the research was to determine the views and opinions of clinical mentors and student nurses on the assessment of clinical practice. Methods: A quantitative descriptive method was used. 84 undergraduate nursing students participated in the online survey and 37 clinical mentors completed the printed version of the survey. Data collection took place from October to November 2015. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test and Pearson correlation coefficient were used in the analysis. Results: More clinical mentors than students believe that they should be thoroughly prepared for clinical practice (U = 790, p < 0.001). Pearson's coefficient of correlation (r = %0.215, p = 0.024) has shown that satisfaction with the assessment of all respondents is greater if the assessment is formative and not only summative. The hi-square test has shown that the respondents rated the assessment tool as satisfactory (n = 47, 43.5 %; x2 = 4.3, p =0.229). Discussion and conclusion: Most respondents are not satisfied with the methods of clinical practice assessment. They are aware of the weaknesses of the assessment tool. They also pointed out the time pressure component in mentoring students. The research contributes to a better understanding of the clinical practice assessment process.
Keywords		mentorstvo zdravstvena nega medicinske sestre vrednotenje mentoring nurses nursing evaluation