| Author/Editor | Puc, Jure; Obadić, Petra; Erčulj, Vanja; Borovečki, Ana; Grosek, Štefan | |
| Title | A CROSS-sectional study among healthcare and non-healthcare students in Slovenia and Croatia about do-not resuscitate decision-making | |
| Translated title | Presečna raziskava med slovenskimi in hrvaškimi študenti zdravstvenih in nezdravstvenih ved o odločitvah za neoživljanje | |
| Type | članek | |
| Vol. and No. | Letnik 58, št. 3 | |
| Publication year | 2019 | |
| Volume | str. 139-147 | |
| ISSN | 0351-0026 - Zdravstveno varstvo : Slovenian journal of public health | |
| Language | eng | |
| Abstract | Namen: Preučiti mnenja študentov glede odločitev o avtonomiji pacientov in njihovi največji koristi z vidika odločati se za neoživljanje. Metode: Opravljena je bila presečna raziskava med študenti medicine, zdravstvene nege, filozofije, prava in teologije prvih in zadnjih letnikov študija univerz v Ljubljani in Zagrebu v akademskem letu 2016/2017. Vprašalnik je bil zasnovan na podlagi vprašalnika Janvier et al., ki so predstavili klinične primere v obliki vinjet. Rezultati: Na raziskavo se je odzvalo 45,4 % (512) študentov v Ljubljani in 37,9 % (812) v Zagrebu. Rezultati naše raziskave so pokazali statistično pomembne razlike pri odločitvah za neoživljanje v različnih primerih med študenti zdravstvenih in nezdravstvenih fakultet obeh držav. Študentje moškega spola in verni študentje obeh držav imajo nižje obete po upoštevanju želje svojcev za neoživljanje pacienta (razmerje verjetnosti 0,49% 0,54; 95-odstotni interval zaupanja). Vsi študentje so se strinjali, da bi pri oživljanju dali prednost otrokom, če bi morali izbirati med več pacienti hkrati. Zaključki: Študijska smer, spol in versko prepričanje so glavni dejavniki, ki vplivajo na odločitve študentov o oživljanju, upoštevanju želje svojcev glede oživljanja, pacientovi avtonomiji in največjih koristih za pacienta.Objective: To survey university students on their views concerning the respect for autonomy of patients and the best interest of patients in relation to the withholding of resuscitation. Methods: A cross-sectional survey among university students of medicine, nursing, philosophy, law and theology of the first and the final study years at the University of Ljubljana and the University of Zagreb was conducted during the academic year of 2016/2017. A questionnaire constructed by Janiver et al. presenting clinical case vignettes was used. Results: The survey response rates for students in Ljubljana and Zagreb were 45.4% (512 students) and 37.9% (812 students), respectively. The results of our research show statistically significant differences in do-not resuscitate decisions in different cases between medical and non-medical students in both countries. Male and religious students in both countries have lower odds of respecting relatives% wishes for the withholding of resuscitation (odds ratio 0.49%0.54; 95% confidence interval). All students agreed that they would first resuscitate children if they had to prioritize among patients. Conclusions: Our study clearly shows that gender, religious beliefs, and type of study are important factors associated with the decisions pertaining to the respect for autonomy, patient%s best interest, and initiation or withholding of resuscitation. | |
| Keywords | etika oživljanje neoživljanje avtonomija največja korist študentje kultura religija narodnost ethics resuscitation withholding autonomy best-interest students culture religion nationality |